Every U.S. citizen from the individual voter to the politician must view our country’s recent, recurring, war making motives as factors when considering future defense and financial security decision-making.
_______________________________________________________________________
Our near term future as a country involves weighty decisions regarding fiscal and national security. There are trade offs during federal government war-making decisions and incremental funding authorizations.
We are approaching a National Debt of $35Trillion with a downgraded fiscal credit rating while carrying the financial burden of ongoing support for NATO and the Ukraine war, the Middle East Gaza conflict, as well as domestic program needs.
A look over our shoulder at two driving factors of our recent warfare is useful as we consider history when viewing our future while making prudent decisions on the principal contributors to our national debt and security.
DRIVING FACTOR 1 – GOVERNMENT CONTRACTOR MOTIVES:
The motives of the U.S. Military Industrial Complex (MIC) and The US Agency for International Development (USAID) contractors have fostered continuing wars. Ongoing warfare nets billions in sales of weapons plus massive construction and redevelopment dollars for international companies. They often operate fraudulently, fostering waste, fraud and abuse.
It is common knowledge that many of these corporations spent more each year in lobbying costs than they paid in taxes and passed exorbitant overhead and executive pay costs on to the tax payer, thus financing the riches of their operating personnel while remaining marginally profitable to stockholders.
I watched this from the inside of many of these companies for 36 years. You can read my dissertation on the subject at:
Here is an example of how the lobbying and behind the scenes string pulling worked during the run up and the conduct of the war incursion into Iraq:
While soldiers and civilians die.
DRIVING FACTOR 2 – LACK OF CULTURAL UNDERSTANDING
There has been a complete lack of cultural understanding between U.S./Western decision makers and the middle east culture they have tried to “Assist” by nation building.
The only real cultural understanding that existed during the period was in the person of General Schwarzkopf who spent much of his youth in the Middle East with his father, an ambassador to Saudi Arabia. He was fascinated by the Arab culture, commanded their respect and, like Eisenhower, led a successful coalition during the first Gulf War to free Kuwait.
He astutely recommended no occupation of Iraq, went home and stayed out of government. Norman, like General Eisenhower, knew the power of the MIC.
U.S Tax payers funded billions in USAID and construction projects in Iraq. The money was wasted due to a lack of cultural understanding, waste, fraud and abuse. The Project On Government Oversight (POGO) has documented that aspect of the Iraq war history, as well as similar motives and abuses in Afghanistan.
CONCLUSION AND A HOPE FOR OUR FORTHCOMING DECISIONS:
History has been repeating itself here – much like Vietnam and Iraq, the above two factors are deeply at play with a lack of astute learning in our government as we look back over our shoulder.
We must come to the understanding, like a highly respected war veteran and West Point Instructor has, that military victory is dead. “MODERN WAR INSTITUTE AT WEST POINT” “Victory’s been defeated; it’s time we recognized that and moved on to what we actually can accomplish.”
Frank Spinney, a foremost expert on the MIC, spent the same time I did on the inside of the Pentagon while I worked in Industry. You may find his interviews informative.
I have hope these historical factors are useful in considering our future financial and defense security and that every U.S. citizen from the individual voter to the politician will consider them in their decision-making.
No comments:
Post a Comment